BREAKING: Elections Assistance Commission Is Now Being Sued For Secretly Permitting Access To The Internet On Election Machines

(Republican Party News) – Everything about the 2020 presidential election and many other smaller elections that have taken place since then seems incredibly suspect. It makes you wonder how long voter fraud by the left in this country has been taking place.

According to a new report from Gateway Pundit, the Elections Assistance Commission is now being sued after they updated their policy and started allowing voting machines to include access to the Internet. These changes were talked about in private with voting machine companies and then silently passed by the EAC without a required public debate (screen shot here).

Earlier this year, GP reported that the EAC had approved the certification for two different audit firms within a four hour window of a report the same publisher put out revealing that these firms were not certified.

“We’ve asked what processes did the EAC go through to update these individuals’ credentials and re-certify them within 4 hours of our article being published noting that they weren’t certified,” GP says in its report.

A man by the name of Philip Stark has a rather checkered past. He had resigned from Verified Voting which makes you think he might be one of the good guys.

“Philip Stark is also a Board member of the EAC and was also in the news lately when he was selected to be one of three ‘auditors’ selected for the New Hampshire audit. We reported the following on Stark,” the report continues.

“It appears very likely that the course of this audit has been quietly steered by top Democratic leadership in the U.S. Congress, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D), through the auditors themselves. Both Philip Stark, Ph.D. and Barbara Simons, Ph.D., the board chair of Verified Voting and also a member of George Soros’ elite Democracy Alliance Board, are current appointees to the corrupt and powerful U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC),” the report adds.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi appointed Stark back in 2016, and Simons was appointed by former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid way back in 2008, then re-affirmed by then-Senate Minority now Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

“Stark made an early exit in New Hampshire never to be seen again. It’s not known how much time and effort he supplied to the audit and what he was paid for being an auditor in name only. Nor is it known why he left,” the report says.

Start is once again in the news. However, this time he’s in the headlines because he has filed a lawsuit against EAC, where he is serving as a board member. Stark and the organization, Free Speech for People, are now suing EAC for updating its voting machine guidelines and allowing them to have access to the Internet, which could make it a whole lot easier for voter fraud to occur during elections.

This is proof that the EAC lacks integrity. The changes made to their policies for voting machines could make it easier for radical leftists to sabotage future elections and prevent the American people from being able to make their voices heard concerning who is leading the country.

Copyright 2021.


  1. Not surprising to hear the Democrats have been behind all the underhanded schemes to steal the election..which they did win but only because they made sure there were enough votes to assure Biden won. I don’t think all Democrats are behind the cheating but those that are should be behind bars, these are the Swamp, bad Dems who cannot walk a straight line or tell the truth. They all need to be voted out. The election audits, when finished, should put the rightful winner and true President back in the White House. Trump 2020

  2. Of course we know that the election was corrupted so that Biden would win. It has been proven time and time again but the lawsuits have been dismissed not because there is no proof, but because the Judges have determined that the person doing the lawsuit has no standing or basically no right to initiate the lawsuit. This is nothing more than a convenient way to get rid of a lawsuit that shows and proves corruption and the Democrats then say that proves there was no corruption. No, it proves that some Liberal Judge dismissed the lawsuit on a technicality without even looking at the facts.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here