Moderna CEO: Vaccines Won’t Handle New Variant

(Republican Party News) – The latest COVID-19 variant, the omicron variant, has begun taking the world by storm and we can expect the push for more and more vaccines to follow especially when the CEO of Moderna, one of the biggest vaccine producers in the world, has stated that the current vaccines will be no match for the omicron strain.

The truly frustrating part of the entire thing is that it is the vaccines causing all of these so-called new variants. If it weren’t for the vaccines and if doctors were supported in treating COVID patients with safe and effective drugs, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, the entire pandemic charade would have ended a long time ago.

Unfortunately, here we are. Dealing with yet another variant.

Stéphane Bancel, Moderna CEO, has predicted that the current vaccines are not going to work to stop the omicron variant (they also don’t work to stop any of the other variants) and has warned that it would be months before a vaccine capable of tackling the new strain would be able to be manufactured.

“There is no world, I think, where [the effectiveness] is the same level… we had with [the] delta [variant],” Bancel told the Financial Times in an interview at his company’s headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

He added that “all the scientists I’ve talked to… are like, ‘This is not going to be good.'”

Of course it’s not going to be good. The vaccines are only creating stronger, more resistant strains of the COVID-19 virus.

President Biden has described omicron as “a cause for concern, not a cause for panic,” arguing the government’s medical experts “believe that the vaccines will continue to provide a degree of protection against severe disease.”

However, Biden has never been honest with the American people and anything he says should be taken with a grain of salt and a healthy dose of skepticism.

Biden also pointed out that the vaccines are designed to focus on the COVID spike protein to boost the immune system and 32 of the 50 mutations in the omicron variant are on that protein.

Meanwhile, COVID patron saint Dr. Fauci has dismissed the power and effectiveness of natural immunity from previous COVID infection despite countless studies proving otherwise. A myriad of scientists and health professionals have claimed that natural immunity is far superior to any vaccine, yet, Saint Fauci knows best.

Fauci is standing by the vaccines, as we would expect him to, despite a study published last month showing the Moderna vaccines were only about 56% effective against the virus amid the delta outbreak.

While Fauci will likely push for more vaccines and new vaccines, other health professionals are working to end this maddening cycle. Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, former health adviser to the federal government, along with Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Medicine, have teamed up with others to compile a list of 135 studies proving natural immunity is superior to any immunity provided by the so-called vaccines.

“We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to existing vaccines. Instead, we should respect the right of the bodily integrity of individuals to decide for themselves,” Alexander writes for the Brownstone Institute.

If we’re supposed to be following the science and listening to the experts, one would think Alexander would be at the top of that list. He’s a former assistant professor at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, in evidence-based medicine and research methods. He’s also a former adviser to WHO-PAHO in Washington, DC, and a former senior advisor for COVID pandemic policy at Health and Human Services.

Alexander isn’t playing along with the COVID narrative, however, and is therefore no longer an “expert” worthy to be listened to. He’s also alleging that public health officials, the medical establishment and the mainstream media outlets are “misleading the public with assertions that the COVID-19 shots provide greater protection than natural immunity.”

He notes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky claimed in a statement published in October 2020 in the British journal The Lancet that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.”

However, it’s been settled science for more than a century that natural immunity provides excellent protection against a respiratory virus’s outer coat proteins.

Alexander points out that while the CDC dismisses the effectiveness of natural immunity for COVID, they somehow recognize it for chicken-pox, measles, mumps and rubella.

Funny how that works, isn’t it?

Copyright 2021.


  1. Since the “old” vaccine won’t “protect” from the “new” virus, for rather even less than the old vaccine protected from the old virus, I think the people who are so obsessed with their “exposure” need to move to the uninhabited regions of the Antarctic.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here